Book Club
Each week, members of the ForeWord staff choose a book to read and discuss. An excerpt from each book is available only during the week that book is featured. We encourage you to read the current book or past selections, and post your comments. To add a comment, just click the Comments link below each primary blog entry. Let's talk about books!
 Friday, October 12, 2007

I usually let novels pile up until they begin to spill under the table before sitting down on the pink couch to read. The spillover takes a surprisingly short amount of time. Surprising or awesome, depending on how you look at it. More than anything else around here, we get novels. Considering that the buyer’s market supports 85% nonfiction to 15% fiction, you have to wonder if there are more people writing novels than reading them. Either novelists are the consummate overachievers, or the folks with the most time on their hands.

So, I sit on the pink couch to read. I read the first paragraph. If it doesn’t do anything for me, I toss the novel into the rejection heap. Here are some first lines that didn’t do anything for me:

From here in Naples, Florida, in our new house, in my new bedroom with its window screen that always has a bright colored lizard crawling across it, I have wondered when my problems started.

First of all, when I got to the end, I felt a little confused by the grammar. Second, I don’t believe that there’s always a “bright colored lizard” on anyone’s screen.

“Sophie opened the door, then stood, reluctant to enter. There was a smell, a scent in the air…

There’s a fine line between too much information and too little in opening paragraphs. This one has too little, and what it does have is cliché.

I met Bryan Hillary on the back byways of the vast Nebraska plains in the early summer of 2006. We had both just experienced strange events in our lives and separately decided to take to the road and travel the dark backwater of the country, the place from where all good stories flow.

And this one has too much. That, plus too many adjectives—take them all out. And oh, that pedantic last clause.

Finally, this one has too many adjectives (contrary to what you may have learned in elementary school, adjectives do not make writing more interesting…it’s the contrary) and 100% cliché.

Her heart was pounding as she sat in the car. Before her was the house, a giant white colonial with black shutters, a quaint portico and the three-car garage set off to the side where she now found herself wondering, What have I done?

Now here are a few that caught my attention:

The people of Rio call their city, “the most beautiful place in the world.” A choir reciting in unison: “The most beautiful place in the world…” This sentiment has been expressed in a variety of tongues in various forms, from tourist handbooks to exotically spiced films, from the conquistadores of the past to the carnival tourists of today who come to visit in package tours. And I agree — although I don’t really know how they conceive of this thing called “the world,” I do believe I’ve seen enough of it.

The first two sentences had me. It’s the sound sense coming in so quickly, then words like “spiced,” “conquistadores,” “carnival,” followed by a certain attractive weariness.

Let me tell you about the time your grandfather took a sledgehammer to the car.

Not “Let me tell you how MY…” but “how YOUR…”

All right, so I listened to my wife. After all, I’ve been doing it for nearly forty years, I should have stopped now? Boy, is she going to feel guilty.

Instantly, a familiar style of speaking, and along with that, certain expectations. I’ll read on.

And finally,

Women only have to come into contact with me to fall ill. They catch colds, they sneeze, sometimes their throats are affected…. For them, it is the first time. Their healthy days were before my time.

Pretty funny. Nothing like a sneeze sixteen words into a story. I’ll keep reading this one too, and so can you. See you soon. Let’s talk. H

posted on Friday, October 12, 2007 1:17:58 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Comments [11] Trackback
Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:42:35 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
The Unforeseen is moving rapidly like a launched germ. After taking Vitamin C for the sneezing and snuffing at the start, I find the text echoing with I's, I's and I's. It's as if Fedele in Gogol's Diary of a Madman were having a one way conversation with himself.
Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:35:12 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Exactly. The main character (whose name I don't think we know) is completely self-absorbed. He is going through life without paying real attention to anyone or anything around him.

This book gives me the feeling I get sometimes on a weekend day, when I realize at 5:00 that I've gone the whole day without speaking to another person, except to say "Thank you, I'm just looking" at the mall. I think that is the way "Serge" lives his life. I'm nearly finished with the book and he has never really come outside of himself and made a connection with another person. He just observes them from the outside.

Could it just be because of a stuffy head from his perpetual cold or is this man crazy? I hope we find out what is really happening with Laure. I wish we could hear her side of the story.
Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:01:29 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
I love it that you think his self-absorption could be because of the cold! It never occurred to me – and I don’t think it’s true at all – but it FEELS so right.

And maybe you’ve found the key to why this guy Serge (not his real name but the name of a friend he hasn’t seen or heard from in years) is such an obnoxious fellow. I’m reminded of those cold remedy ads where the cartoon character is walking around with a head that’s sometimes a balloon, sometimes a wad of undescribed dampness. That’s so Serge. Sometimes, physically, his head is a ridiculously light burden and sometimes absurdly heavy. Most of the time, he doesn’t really seem to be conscious at all. Rather, he’s just an object that reacts to the superficial gestures of those who come in contact with him. Serge can’t ever anticipate anything – which is, I believe, one of the products of consciousness – and he always believes himself to be either the center of attention or on the outermost periphery. Notice, too, that he only finds other people “interesting” by pieces. Like, she has “interesting” legs. Or, he loves her eyes.

So Serge has been living with Laure for a year. She made room for him in her apartment by moving the hangers over a little in her closet. (Again, imagine that balloon.) And now, she’s gotten sick. Like all his other girl friends have, at one time or another gotten sick.

Is it really that she’s become like him? She’s become impenetrable, impossible to pin down. Hmmmm.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:25:08 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I wheezed through another portion of this book. Put it aside when faux-Serge sneezed seven times in a row, speculating on the effect of a sneeze when it goes unheard. He still loves cold ridden Laurie. I liked the rare metaphor of parallelepipeds of butter, which reminded me of Prout's madeleine.

Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:46:37 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I'm not feeling a lot of enthusiasm for this novel -- although I know Whitney sat very still on her couch for a long time as she finished it, then walked around the office, appearing quite jumpy. Yeah, there's the sneezing issue, but that isn't really so bad, is it? Remember that Steven King novel, The Stand, with its graphic descriptions of a mutating virus wiping out the human population. I had the book with me on a bus heading out of Chicago. (That was back in the days when smoking in public was not unconscionable, or even illegal.) I'll bet that book is still there where I shoved it between the window and the seat.

So, I don't think it's the guy sneezing, or even the girl sneezing that's uncomfortable for readers -- at least our office readers. What is it then?
Friday, November 02, 2007 3:08:14 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
For me it's not the sneezing. It's the fact that this guy is such an unreliable narrator. He has no idea of what is happening outside his own head--or maybe he just doesn't care. The reader is only able to hear his own self-centered thoughts and therefore we don't know what the other characters think of him or this situation he has gotten himself into. This is what makes me feel very uncomfortable. Wait until you get to the end. It is "unforeseen" indeed.
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:04:18 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I don't know -- is he really "unreliable"? What makes a narrator unreliable?
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:23:21 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
He's unreliable. He won't tell us anything that's actually going on around him--until the end. Up until he reaches Philippe's house, all he would say is things like, the girls at the drug store looked like they were waiting for him all day. Or the girls at the bakery dressed provocatively on purpose to entice him. How can we trust him when he makes up things like this?

When he reaches Philippe's house, it's like he finally sees that a world exists outside his own head. And he is spurred into action, forgetting his silly cell phone and his own drama for a moment.
Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:58:52 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
He "won't" tell?
Wednesday, November 07, 2007 7:11:01 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I don't really think he changed at the end. All along, he's been reacting to only the things that he can see/taste/hear/touch/smell. He occasionally tries to guess what a person means by this smile or that gesture, but he never actually acts on any of these assumptions. I think that's what makes him seem slightly less than conscious. Like a child, he is constantly reacting to the visible world, then turning away to suck his thumb.

What I found most interesting about the book was its accomplishment in style. It's totally nouveau roman (New Novel), meaning that plot, character, etc. is sublimated to the individual's view of the world. Most nouveau roman end up being about objects, about the physical world. Certainly the case here -- we know exactly the way the guy turned his head, lifted his knee, blew his nose. What we don't know is what anyone else did, unless our protagonist was looking at them directly. And we never know his real name because no one ever mentions it.

So the style worked, at least for me. At first it made me laugh. His self-absorption was clownish. Then, as I got more into it, it made me drunk, slightly hysterical.

However, for a book obsessed with objects, it's not much of an artifact. Like the guy imagining the landscape fading away into both the past and the present, so this book was only of the moment. A bit like trying to remember what you ate for dinner, or where you left your keys, or who's the 4 o'clock appointment, the words inside the guy's head fall away. There is no trajectory, there is just leaning forward and leaning back. Most of all, there is no meaning.

Towards the end, he mentions the symbol of a caduceus on a car. I actually paused there, and wondered where in the world the guy got that information. It presumed a past, a history, an education of some kind. It was rather shocking.

Rather shocking the whole pointlessness of it all.
Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:16:49 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
The book is finally finished, and I feel healthier for it. I think the narrator had Werther-fever, the lament of an unhappy lover who made himself sick. Also, he was touched be the lethargy of Oblomovism, an inertness of spirit and language, for I rarely felt the energy of phrase.

Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview