ForeWord Publishing Insider
Industry leaders highlight current trends and the latest headlines
 Wednesday, February 06, 2008

This week, a “close friend” of O.J. Simpson offered Kunati—a publisher focused on “controversial and provocative books”—a tell-all book project: “O.J. told me that I was the only man he was comfortable enough to talk openly with. Web of Controversy will remove the public facade of O.J. Simpson.” Nice friend. More O.J. controversy. Will it sell? Almost certainly.

Condemning Controversy?

Why are readers receptive to controversy? Judging from a report I received this week—the Library Open Access report “Tracking Challenges in Libraries: 2007 Results”—the opposite is true. Patrons are vocal in condemning anything notorious or contentious. It seems that some library patrons would bring back book-burning. So, why do Kunati’s provocative books sell so well? Why do controversial books such as The Da Vinci Code become bestsellers? How is it that publishers can turn controversy into bestsellers and provocation into opportunity when some readers seem vocally in favor of censorship?

Violence, Racism and Promoting Witchcraft

The easy answer seems to be the power of the silent majority—enlightened readers—voting for freedom and fun with their wallets. Librarians, publishers and booksellers continue to offer these books despite a vocal minority. Among the condemned titles from library patrons in the “Challenges” report were: Oliver Twist (for violence), Brer Rabbit and Tar Baby Girl (for racism), and—of course—Philip Pullman’s Golden Compass for religious viewpoints. I recall Harry Potter being on a previous list for “promoting witchcraft.” The list of 36 “patron condemned” books in the 2007 list included my favorite classics, making me wonder if this is indeed a 2007 report. Fortunately, the librarians—stewards of free thought—denied all requests to “burn” or remove books.

What’s so Controversial?

A quick analysis of this most entertaining report from librarians shows the most common reasons for requests to “pull” books off library shelves, in order of prominence, were: homosexuality, religious viewpoint, sexually explicit language, violence, offensive language. Thank goodness for librarians, otherwise all of my own novels would be burned:

  • The Game: let’s see, explicit violence, offensive language—it is a thriller, after all

  • The Last Troubadour: ah, religious viewpoint for its portrayal of the Cathars as heroes and the Inquisition as evil?

  • MADicine: oh, probably everything on the no-no list.

I suppose I’d be in good company with nearly all of Kunati’s popular books—including a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and a NY Times bestseller. Not to mention the rest of the “challenges” list: Exit to Eden, The Monkey King, Perks of Being a Wallflower, Rainbow Boys, Fly on the Wall, and the entire religion-based bestselling Left Behind series.

Steve Jobs says, “No One Reads Anymore.”

It seems that Apple’s Steve Jobs believes “people don’t read anymore.” The computer guru declared in his keynote at MacWorld 2007 that Amazon’s new e-ink reader was “dead on arrival” with a sweeping, and inaccurate, statistic: “It doesn’t matter how good or bad the product is, the fact is that people don’t read anymore. Forty percent of the people in the U.S. read one book or less last year.” Good to know, Steve. I guess Job’s forty percent only read controversial books?

According to a landmark study of 10,800 Americans by Persona Corp in 2007: 30.6% “Can’t live without books”; 23.4% “LOVE books”; 20.9% “Read regularly”—totaling 74.9% of all Americans. I guess it depends on whether you make phone gadgets or publish books which survey you trust, although a quick look at actual book sales indicates Persona’s study is closer to the right number.

Book Sales Over 36 Billion Net in 2007

Net revenues on book sales, according to The Book Standard, were up another billion dollars to $35.69 billion net sales in 2006 and another 1% up in 2007. After removing the 162 million in sales, which are exports, this translates into approximately billions of books sold in a nation of three hundred million. Even a rough averaging works out as every man woman and child in America reading at least 12 books each. Clearly, Steve Jobs has some research to do. And Amazon’s out to prove Steve wrong, putting all their sizable marketing muscle behind the Kindle, a device that, by all accounts, might become the iPod of e-books.

Librarians and Publishers Do It For Love

Contrary to the doom and gloom scenarios often painted in the trade news, books are not only alive and well and flourishing (sales continue to go up, and contrary to Steve Jobs, we’re reading books) but the trade remains an important champion of free thought and free will. Is there anything more important to a free nation of free people? I don’t think so.

So next time you visit your public library, don’t forget to shake your librarian’s hand and say “thank you.” Independent booksellers and small press publishers—who publish and sell books for love, not profit—equally deserve the support of free-thinkers everywhere. I’ll go one step further, at risk of offending my beloved indy booksellers—bravo to Amazon, for ignoring the e-book’s checkered history and coming out with the Kindle. We may be a fragmented industry, but we come together for freedom—and we do it for love.

Posted by: Derek Armstrong

Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:15:20 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Numbers, numbers, numbers.

Oh woe is me, a writer looking for a reader (full disclosure: my debut novel is coming from Kunati in September). The 2007 survey by Ipsos Public Affairs for The Associated Press revealed that 27 percent of us haven’t read a book of any kind in the last year. Fortunately for me, the same percentage — 27 percent — read 15 or more. And 8 percent of us read 51 books or more. When you exclude those people who didn’t read a single book, the average number of books read in America last year was 20.

As Randall Stross said in the NY Times (1/27/2008—where much of this info was found), one can only wonder why 408 million books will be bought in the US if no one reads anymore.

The Book Industry Study Group estimates book publishing will bring in about $15 billion in revenue in the US this year. I did a little checking, by the way, and that’s not far short of the total worldwide revenues of the recorded music industry last year ($17.6 billion according to the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry). And yes, that includes digital downloads.
Here’s some food for thought for Steve Jobs: Music sales in all forms—including digital downloads—fell by 9.5% in the US last year, according to Nielsen SoundScan, which counts 10 digital track downloads as equivalent to one album. While it’s true that total music units sold rose substantially, that’s counting each downloaded song as a unit, which would be like counting each book chapter instead of the entire volume as one unit.

It’s all apples and oranges, of course, but sometimes it’s fun to play with the numbers--especially when they're in your favor.
Friday, February 08, 2008 12:00:14 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Great article, Derek. How ironic that you mention the OJ book possibility. In September, I attended a writers' conference in Pennsylvania and was fortunate to meet Eric Kampmann, the publisher of If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer. I even wrote about If I Did It on my blog. There certainly was a lot of controversy surrounding the book and quite a lot behind the scenes as well.

As an avid reader, author and someone who watches the book world quite closely, I think people are naturally curious. We don't like to be told "no, you can't read that". We feel compelled to check it out for ourselves. And that's why controversial books continue to sell.

How strange that Catholic schools will ban The Golden Compass, yet some have accepted my novel Whale Song, which deals with west coast native spiritualism, racism, child abuse and assisted death. In the 300+ events that I have held, I think maybe 3 times I've heard someone say they wouldn't read Whale Song because of religious beliefs. So does controversy sell?

Darn right! And it will continue to sell as long as we have the ability to make up our own minds. If we weren't drawn to controversy, then we wouldn't care about what's going on with Britney Spears or her sister, or the torture of prisoners during war, or who is the best candidate for President...and we'd certainly never watch TV shows like Law & Order or Celebrity Apprentice.

As for Steve Jobs' comment, I'd like to know how many people he actually interviewed. And where did he find this 40% who read a book or less/year--on an island in the middle of nowhere? Almost everyone I know reads. Many listen to audio books. Last year, I read about 75 books.

A good book is irreplaceable.

I look forward to reading your next article, Derek. Oh, and by the way, I met Gene Schwartz (editor of Foreword) at the same conference. :)

~Cheryl Kaye Tardif,
bestselling author of Whale Song, The River and Divine Intervention
Monday, February 11, 2008 6:28:28 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Great article with good points. It's nice to read that the doom and gloom about booksales propagated by some press is false.

Karen Harrington, author, JANEOLOGY
Monday, February 11, 2008 6:30:02 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ah ... the heart thumping thrill of cracking open a good book! The thrill and that wonderful booky odor of a library! The hard work and loyalty to readers of authors! Rock on and write on and to hell with gadgetry! Books will always rule.

Todd Sentell, author of the hilarious TOONAMINT OF CHAMPIONS
Monday, February 11, 2008 7:10:34 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Guess those of us who read are fossils. Funny how many people of all ages I see with a book open traveling on planes, trains and all manner of transport that get us from here to there. Great blogging, Derek, we need more folk like you who support great books, authors and readers.

Linda merlino, author, Belly of the Whale
Monday, February 11, 2008 7:17:26 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Ya know, it's so ironic that you wrote about this, Derek, because I noticed this on the Publisher's Marketplace site today, under "Deal of the Day":
Non-fiction: General/Other: O.J. Simpson's long-time sports agent Michael Gilbert HOW I HELPED O.J. GET AWAY WITH MURDER, promising to "detail O.J.'s late-night confession" and provide "shocking new proof that O.J. Simpson did indeed murder Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman" along with information on Gilbert's crucial role in obtaining the not guilty verdict and why he stayed silent for so long, to Regnery, with a portion of his royalties pledged to the Make-a-Wish Foundation.

If Gilbert had pledged 100 percent of his royalties to Make-A-Wish or perhaps an organization that benefits battered women and children, I MIGHT not have to supress the urge to throw up when I read that somebody actually has agreed to publish this book.
No..wait, just one moment.. NOPE, can't do it. In rereading the "Deal of the Day", that gagging instinct is still overriding my desire to see women or children benefitted by the dregs of society and their sordid lives.

(I say that with full knowledge that my novel, Courage in Patience (Kunati Books, September 08) has the issue of censorship as one of its themes. It even incorporates portions of the Freedom to Read Statement!)

Now that I have fully self-disclosed, I will go on to say that there has to be a limit..let's see, how about this: common decency, perhaps? that would make a publisher say, "Not no, but, HELL, no, I'm not publishing a book by anybody who could possibly justify helping an S.O.B. like O.J. Simpson get away with murder." I can't think of a good reason to stay silent for any amount of time, if Gilbert knew the "truth." And, no, I can assure you that my naturally curious mind will not be able to override the aforementioned vomiting impulse that the news of this books' sale brings about.

Maybe it's because I feel a kinship with abused women and children, but, really, now, the reading public's thirst for sensationalism aside (kinda like not being able to keep from looking at a horrible car accident as one putt-putts by it on the highway, right?), where does the role of decency and regard for the victims and their families come in to decisions to publish books such as the "Deal of the Day"?

Monday, February 11, 2008 7:37:27 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
It's interesting to remember all the books we now call classics that were (and some still are) on the "bad" list.
It's not the tittilating I'm after. It's the truth.
The truths about what it's like to be alive--in another persons's skin and thoughts, to live in fear, to die, to do something the scares you, dares you.
It's that's controversial, then so be it.

In the words of Flannery O'Connor when asked if she was concerned her work was controversial, she said,
"No, I'd be concerned if it's not."

~Carol D. O'Dell
Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:30:02 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Although I write thrillers with a fair share of violence, I understand that some people will be offended by my books. However, banning books isn't the answer --- I don't want someone, no matter how well intentioned, to decide what I can read. The answer is an informed consumer, perhaps with a rating system that allows readers to make an intelligent choice.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:59:00 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I just got my hands on a kindle-Amazon's new reader. They seem to have the ergonomics right: it feels good and reads good. What's really missing is something to read on it. My guess is that their miserly royalty strategy is going to keep most authors, agents and publishers away. Amazon is taking 65% of the selling price of a cost-free download. There's also no security against the device being hacked and books being swapped like mp3's.

Lynn Hoffman, author of bang BANG and The New Short Course in Wine
Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:03:12 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
I guess I fall into the "I coudn't live without books" category, as do an awful lot of people I know. The growing popularity of book clubs would indicate that people are not only still interested in reading, but want to talk about books and get suggestions from others about exciting new books they might read.

Amazon's Kindle is a cool idea, but I really do not believe that good old print books will ever go out of style - because they are so transportable, so much easier to cuddle up in bed with, and so much more...bookish!

Thanks for launching this discussion, Derek. I'm glad our librarians are defending books of all kinds, although I have always found the whole idea of book-burning to have a kind of lurid fascination: so very extreme!

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:40:18 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
Nice article Derek and it raises a few excellent points. For me personally, the link between literature and controversy is permanent and necessary, especially in a society that demands its right to free speech. Pushing that barrier is all part of the fun isn’t it? As for the future and the role of ‘the book’ who knows. I can understand people’s reluctance to let go of paper and reach for the gadget but I also feel sure it will come. Accepting this is important if you want to be ready when it happens. I think it was only last year that I finally consigned my vinyl’s to the scrap heap, although I must admit, my estranged wife did a sterling job of smashing them up and so condemning me to the world of the Ipod. Never looked back….and don’t miss either.

Recycling Jimmy: www.andytilley.blogspot.com
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (Some html is allowed: a@href@title, b, blockquote@cite, i, u) where the @ means "attribute." For example, you can use <a href="" title=""> or <blockquote cite="Scott">.  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview