Maybe you don’t know what a Radiohead is but you can bet
your children do and moreover they have probably recently made a rational
economic decision on the value to them of the band’s most recent album. Why is
this important to book publishers? Well directly perhaps not so much, but the
indirect impact of what Radiohead announced last week will be significant to
all media including publishing.
As an established band, Radiohead have a large existing fan
base and they are taking their music directly to this fan base by releasing
their new album via download at whatever price the fan wants to pay. If the fan
believes as stated by one of them, that the band is ‘rich enough’ they can pay
99cents for the entire thing (they could get it for free) or they can pay a
traditional retail price of $12.95. Whatever.
Radiohead receives all the revenue rather than having to split a fee with a
recording company. Suddenly, after nurturing and investing in Radiohead over
the past 10 years there is no longer a place for the record company. Is this
fair you wonder? The question really doesn’t matter because the old model of
artist development is dead. Music
companies are going to have to create a new model where reliance is not so much
on revenues derived from recordings but shared across the pantheon of revenue
opportunities from merchandising to touring to music publishing. The transition
will be brutal for both the artists and the recording companies.
Radiohead finished recording their new album only 10 days before they released it via
their web site. Fans have two product
choices: They can take a download and pay what they want or they can have a
download and preorder a traditional CD and book package. The latter will be
release in December. I expect that despite
the availability of the download many fans will either buy the CD package
initially or return later to buy it. Radiohead are likely to make a pile of
money from this model both because of their fan base and due to the publicity
that the action has generated. Typically a band would make more money touring
than they would from CD sales mainly because their cut of the full retail price
is so small. It is because they have so little to lose and that they want to
get people to come out and see them that more bands will elect to forgo CD
royalties in order to build tour revenues.
Back to publishing. What happens when John Grisham or Stephen
King decide to forego a publishing contract and go direct? Well the truth of
the matter is that it is already happening. Remember The Long Tail? The book was available for review and comment online
long before it was finally published and this not only helped the author fine
tune his argument it increased publicity for the printed book. There are other
examples and the model will become more prevalent where authors either
independently or with a publisher’s collaboration will allow free or discounted
access to books both before and after publication.
The economic model may be less different between music and
book publishing than is first thought. Related revenues in music come from
merchandising and touring and in book publishing they can come from movie, tv,
merchandising, and rights. Point is in both cases artists and authors and
publishers and producers will increasingly be looking at the totality of
revenue opportunities rather than in narrow terms. This could lead to some
interesting new collaborations: the screen writer that signs a book deal with a
movie producer, the musician who signs a CD deal with a book publisher, or the
author that signs a deal with a tour organizer. To some degree these models are
starting to become more apparent and as publishers we will need to think more
creatively and in collaboration with the authors we publish so that we can
remain competitive in an environment where the traditional boundaries are being
eroded.
Posted by: Michael Cairns, Information Media Partners